DoorDash, a leading food delivery service, has agreed to pay nearly $17 million to delivery drivers in New York as part of a settlement addressing claims that the company improperly used drivers’ tips to supplement their wages. This resolution comes after scrutiny over DoorDash’s compensation practices, particularly in relation to the payments drivers receive for their services.

The settlement is part of a larger trend in which gig economy companies are facing legal challenges concerning the treatment and compensation of their workers. Drivers alleged that DoorDash had allocated their tips to meet minimum wage guarantees, which contradicts the company’s policy of passing 100% of tips directly to workers. The settlement aims to provide restitution to affected drivers and reinforce the practice of fair compensation within the gig economy.

As part of the agreement, DoorDash will also implement changes to enhance transparency in its pay practices, ensuring that drivers are fully aware of how their earnings are calculated and distributed. The company emphasized its commitment to fair treatment and compensation for its delivery personnel.

**Energy Transfer Initiates $300 Million Defamation Trial Against Greenpeace**

In a separate legal matter, Energy Transfer, an oil and natural gas company known for its involvement in the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline, has commenced a $300 million defamation trial against the environmental advocacy group, Greenpeace. The case stems from allegations that Greenpeace engaged in a campaign of defamation during protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017.

Energy Transfer alleges that Greenpeace disseminated false information about the company and its operations, which the company claims caused significant reputational damage and financial losses. The pipeline has been the subject of intense scrutiny and protests, primarily from environmental groups and Indigenous rights advocates who argue that its construction threatens water resources and sacred lands.

Greenpeace has characterized the lawsuit as a strategic move to silence dissent and distract from ongoing environmental concerns associated with fossil fuel projects such as the Dakota Access Pipeline. The advocacy group asserts that its protests are protected under the First Amendment and are essential in raising awareness about environmental and social issues.

The legal proceedings are expected to draw significant public interest, as they will not only address the specific claims made by Energy Transfer but also broader questions about corporate accountability and the rights of advocacy groups to challenge corporate practices.

As these two significant legal battles unfold, they exemplify the increasing tensions between high-profile companies in the gig economy and energy sectors and the rights of workers and activists to voice their concerns and seek justice.

Load More